Agent workflows with explicit ownership at the edges.
A versioned operating architecture for routing work across models, tools, knowledge sources, and devices without hiding the moments that still require human judgment.
02 / proof surface
01 / The challenge
Start with the operating tension.
Adding agents to a workflow can multiply ambiguity as quickly as it adds leverage. The system needed clear authority, replaceable components, bounded handoffs, and a way to recover when an automated path was weak.
02 / The approach
Shape the system around the constraint.
The architecture organizes work by risk, source authority, and review needs. Deterministic tools, local models, frontier models, and human decisions occupy distinct roles instead of being treated as interchangeable magic.
03 / The working system
What exists.
- 01
Intent routing and specialist-role boundaries
- 02
Risk tiers, approval gates, and trust graduation
- 03
Versioned launch, scheduling, retrieval, monitoring, and memory artifacts
- 04
Documented retirement and replacement of weak or provider-coupled paths
Capabilities demonstrated
Transferable judgment, shown in context.
04 / What the evidence supports
Proof on the page.
- Dated architecture specifications document the risk-aware design and approval intent.
- Versioned operational artifacts exist for launch, scheduling, retrieval, monitoring, dispatch, and security boundaries.
- The history preserves consolidation, retired paths, and the provider-coupling failure that motivated a cleaner seam.
Claim boundary
Where the evidence stops.
- The system is not presented as autonomous, production-grade, enterprise-ready, or reliably hands-off.
- Current uptime, intervention rate, and comparative business value require a bounded evaluation.
- Private infrastructure identifiers and security details are excluded.
Next case
03 / Knowledge operations · research + provenanceSOURCEHUB